Simple Camera Calibration in Python for Beginners

This is a collection of algorithms related to multiple view camera calibration in computer vision. Please note that the goal of this package is to provide minimal examples to demostrate the concept for beginners (i.e., students). For large-scale, realtime, accurate, robust, production-quality implementations, or for implementations for your specific situation, please consult your advisor.

Disclaimer

This is research software and may contain bugs or other issues -- please use it at your own risk. If you experience major problems with it, you may contact us, but please note that we do not have the resources to deal with all issues.

How to use

You can simply install the package by pip.

python3 -m pip install -U pycalib-simple

The pip installation, however, does not include examples in ./ipynb/ or tools in ./tools/. To run examples and tools, download the repository explicitly. For example,

1. Local: You can clone/download this repository to your local PC, and open ./ipynb/*.ipynb files by your local Jupyter.
2. Colaboratory: You can open each Jupyter notebook directly in Google Colaboratory by clicking the buttons below.
   • Warning: Most of them do not run properly as-is, since colab does not clone images used in the Jupyter notebooks. Please upload required files manually. (or run !pip install and !git clone at the beginning of each notebook.)

Notice that the scripts in ./tools/ are not supposed to run in Colab/Jupyter.

Examples

1. Extrinsic calibration of 15 GoPro cameras
   • Given 2D-2D correspondences, this example calibrates the extrinsic parameters of 15 GoPro cams.

Single camera

1. Intrinsic calibration with charuco images
   • GoPro fisheye lens distortion is handled by the rational model in OpenCV
2. Intrinsic calibration with chessboard images
   • Zhang's method
3. Extrinsic calibration w.r.t. a charuco board
   • PnP with ChAruco
4. Extrinsic calibration w.r.t. a chessboard
   • PnP with chessboard
5. Intrinsic / Extrinsic calibration with 2D-3D correspondences
   • for non-planar reference objects

Multiple cameras

1. Multi-view triangulation
   • N-view DLT
2. ChAruco diamond marker detection for 2D-2D correspondences
   • for extrinsic calibration using a ChAruco diamond marker
   • also can be used for PnP, i.e., extrinsic calibration w.r.t. the diamond marker
3. Sphere center detection for 2D-2D correspondences
   • for extrinsic calibration using a ball
   • A color-based ball detection is provided as tools/detect_by_color_gui.py and tools/detect_by_color.py. The former GUI version can be used to sample foreground and background pixel colors, and the latter can be used to process each frame.
4. 2-view extrinsic calibration from 2D-2D correspondences
   • decomposes the essential matrix to R and t
5. N-view registration
   • A linear registration of pairwise poses into a single coordinate system
6. N-view bundle adjustment
   • A non-linear minization of reprojection errors
7. N-view time sync
   • Aruco / Aruco diamond video maker for multi-view time sync

3D-3D

1. Absolute orientation (or similarity transform) between corresponding 3D points

If you need to write your own calibration ...

In general, prepare some synthetic dataset, i.e., a toy example, first so that your code can return the exact solution up to the machine epsillon. Then you can try with real data or synthetic data with noise to mimic it.

Also you may want to read Section A6.3 "A sparse Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm" of the textbook "Multiple View Geometry in Computer Vision" by Hartley and Zisserman.

1. Linear calibration: Use numpy.
2. Non-linear (including bundule adjustment): Try scipy.optimize.least_squares first.
   1. Implement your objective function as simple as possible. You do not need to consider the computational efficiency at all. "Done is better than perfect."
      • Test with the toy example and make sure that your objective function returns zero for the ground-truth parameter.
   2. If your simple objective function above is unacceptably slow, try the followings in this order.
      1. Ask yourself again before trying to make it faster. Is it really unacceptable? If your calibration can finish in an hour and you do not do it so often, it might be OK for example. "Premature optimization is the root of all evil." (D. Knuth).
      2. Make sure that the calibration runs successfully anyway. In what follows, double-check that the calibration results do not change before and after the code optimization.
      3. Vectorize the computation with numpy, i.e., no for-loops in the objective function.
         • or use numba (e.g. @numba.jit)
      4. If the system is sparse, use jac_sparsity option. It makes scipy.optimize.least_squares much faster even without analitical Jacobian.
      5. Implement the analytical Jacobian. You may want to use maxima to automate the calculation, or you may use JAX or other autodiff solutions for this.
      6. Reimplement in C++ with ceres-solver, g2o, or sba if the computation speed is really important. You can also consider using PyTorch/Tensorflow for GPU-acceleration and autodiff by Theseus or similar libraries.

Contact

Please note that this is research software and may contain bugs or other issues -- please use it at your own risk. If you experience major problems with it, you may contact us, but please note that we do not have the resources to deal with all issues.